The SCIgen generator creates random research papers that
make no actual sense but nonetheless look impressive. Their looking impressive stems from the
proper use and application of the conventions of a proper research paper. For starters, the generator included a table
of contents that divided the paper into sections that were identified by large,
bolded headers (ex. Introduction). This
contributed to the overall professional quality of the paper. The paper itself was rather long, consisting
of mostly text but also a few graphs and diagrams for added effect. What really makes the paper appear
legitimate, however, is the list of references at the end of the paper. The references are numbered and are cited in
the body of the paper according to those numbers. The sources themselves are no doubt fake or
irrelevant (as is most of the information in the generated papers). However, at a glance the paper appears
legitimate because it contains all the key visual components of an actual
research paper.
The comic strip generator was, in my opinion,
hilarious. Like the SCIgen generator,
the resulting product usually made little to no sense, but it was nonetheless
amusing (I’ve included my favorite generated comic below.) Also like the SCIgen generator, the comics
were convincing at a glance because they applied the conventions of the comic
genre. Firstly, the comics consisted of
images of illustrated cartoons that were separated into individual square
frames. Next, the characters in the
comic would interact with one another—dialogue was written in a speech bubble,
with the tail end facing the speaker (the characters’ mouths would usually be
open in conjunction with this, to further indicate which character was
speaker.) Typically, each frame would
represent a development in the scene at hand, even if that development made no
actual sense. All of these conventions
combined form the foundation for a basic comic. The fact that, without even having to make
sense, these comics can still be recognized as comics demonstrates that the
present conventions are those that make up the comic genre.
Memes are a much more contemporary genre as they’ve only
really risen to prominence in the past five or six years. As a genre whose origins stem solely from the
internet, memes are highly unique and possess easily recognizable traits. From observing and toying with the meme
generator, there are some obvious recurring themes and characteristics that can
be classified as meme conventions. Firstly,
each meme is a square image accompanied by white bolded text. Each image has its own recurring joke or pun:
for example, the Philosoraptor is a meme consisting of the image of a
velociraptor lost in thought, accompanied by philosophical questions about life,
the universe, and existence in general. The image of the Philosoraptor, like many
memes, is placed against a color wheel background. However, there are many memes that are simply
a cropped image, with no real editing aside from the inclusion of the white
text and the meme generator watermark in the corner. Unfortunately, memes are also regularly incredibly
ignorant and prejudiced, often falling back onto sexist, homophobic, and racist
stereotypes and slurs for a punchline. While
not necessarily a convention of memes, it is important to note that a large
part of the meme genre is taken up by such ignorance and that it is common
enough to be considered at the very least associated with the genre. The rise of the meme genre is an incredibly
fascinating display of how genres begin and develop into functioning,
recognizable categories of work.
These generators are excellent tools for mastering
genre. They demonstrate how, without
having to make sense, one can recognize and process the genre that they are
encountering. In order to understand the
conventions that make up these genres, one must simply ask how they know that the work they are viewing is what it is. What makes a meme a meme, or a research paper
a research paper, or a comic a comic?
The content can be very important, but these generators prove that a
genre’s conventions go beyond content alone and encompass layout, appearance,
diction, and tone.

I really enjoyed reading your PB1B! I think your writing is really good; I love how you use different sentence structures so the essay does not feel so repetitive. For the SCIgen generator, I think you could have expanded a little bit more on the papers; for example, referring to the jargon used in the paper. For the comic strips, you elaborated on different details. I agree that the final result usually made little to no sense! The comics were rearranged and each time it was generated. For the meme generator, you pointed out how memes can sometimes include "sexist, homophobic, and racist stereotypes and slurs for a punchline," which is a convention I had not thought of. I agree that these generators are great tools for understanding a genre. I was able to see lots of reoccurring themes in each generator with this site. Overall, I think you did an excellent job with this PB!
ReplyDeleteFederoff,
ReplyDeleteWhat a cool blog aesthetic. Major fan right here. Your Alice Cooper/babysitting story made me laugh, and your use of italics there for emphasis was spot-on. In case you’re curious, which you probably aren’t(!), some of my fave contemporary/indie acts are Palma Violets, Father John Misty, Devendra Banhart, Ed Sharpe and the Zeroes, Alabama Shakes, and Lana.
PB1A: “It’s discarded, retrieved, reexamined, and discarded again multiple times throughout the quarter.” Ha! So true. This was a very thoughtful and thorough analysis of this ever-present college genre, and as someone who has to write these things to stay employed, I thought you did a hell of a job here. Your use of humor within your super-smart analysis makes this even better. Way to go, Federoff.
PB1B: You let a couple little details slip for the SciGen piece, such as the use of technical jargon and graphs/tables. On the comic front, remember that providing evidence or reasons for your claims is always important. You achieved this, I think, by including a picture, but incorporating quotes/dialogue and/or describing the imagery of the scene could really have helped drive home your “rhetorical observations” home (such as its hilariousness).
Grade for both PBs: 5/5
PB1A: “Check plus.”
PB1B: “Check.”
Z
No way! I just saw Palma Violets twice during Spring Break! They signed my vinyl :)
Delete